Real change, not just presentations.
Åsa Fogelin, Head of Development and Test
Micke helped us prioritise going forward.
Emelie Carlsson, Chief Product Officer
He brought better structure and clearer priorities.
Emelie Carlsson, Chief Product Officer
Deep knowledge of technology combined with understanding user needs.
Valentino Rongione, Head of Customer Development
I hope to be working with Mikael sometime again.
Valentino Rongione, Head of Customer Development
I give Mikael the highest recommendations.
Jonas Reimers, Lead Developer, Bombardier
Fun to work with and very professional.
Magnus Lindberg, Independent Consultant
Quickly navigates new environments, both people and technology.
Åsa Fogelin, Head of Development and Test
Clearly structured priorities in a complex, centralised setup.
Terje Mose Pedersen, Nordic Head of E-commerce, TUI
Momentum and alignment despite constant change.
Terje Mose Pedersen, Nordic Head of E-commerce, TUI
Most teams don't have a speed problem. They have a focus problem.
I've spent 30 years watching talented teams work incredibly hard while their products move sideways.
Not because they lack capability, but because ten initiatives compete for the same attention when they should have three.
That's the problem I solve: fewer, better decisions through measurable prioritization, honest math, and clear trade-offs.
Helping companies focus on what actually drives revenue through clearer prioritization, decision models, and business outcomes - not just shipped features.
Three distinct ways to restore product focus, depending on whether you need a defined sprint, hands-on leadership, or strategic senior support.
Best when everything feels important and no one agrees what should come first.
A focused 2-3 week engagement where I help your team decide what to build first, and why.
Best when you need hands-on product leadership during change, growth, or recruitment.
Hands-on product leadership during transformation, growth, or recruitment.
Best when you need senior product direction without a full-time hire. Some call it Fractional CPO.
Strategic product leadership without the need for a full-time hire.
How every engagement works
From chaos to clarity in four steps
First, we understand the situation: what is blocked, what matters most, and what has already been tried.
Next, I build the prioritization model: linking business goals, constraints, trade-offs, and the real factors that should decide what moves first.
Then we use that model to make decisions, cut through noise, and focus effort on the work that creates the most value.
Finally, you get a clearer direction to lead from: better priorities, a practical roadmap, and stronger confidence in what belongs on it.
Feedback from executives and stakeholders I've partnered with
Mikael creates real change, not just presentations.
Mikael and I have worked together twice, and in both cases, Mikael has contributed a lot with his product and technical knowledge.
He quickly navigates new environments, both in terms of people and organisation, technology and architecture.
Mikael is good at achieving real change. A process improvement does not just stop at a PowerPoint presentation, it is transformed into concrete results that make workflows smoother and focus on actual delivery.
His curiosity and commitment mean that he always strives for results while contributing with a positive attitude.
He brought better structure, clearer priorities, and a more unified way of working.
Our product management needed to find new ways of working to create better structure, clearer priorities, and a more unified way of evaluating our work.
Micke took the initiative to clarify principles for our ways of working, creating understanding of what’s important in our daily work and helping us prioritize going forward.
As part of this, he also developed a model and practical tool for more systematically evaluating and prioritizing maintenance work and bugs.
This contributed to greater alignment within the team around what matters, better prioritization, and also freed up time for more forward-looking work.
Bridging regional needs with central teams in a complex, evolving setup.
I have had the pleasure of working with Mikael during our transformation at TUI, where he helped lead the Nordic business change team in collaboration with central platform development.
In a setup that was increasingly centralised around platforms, technologies and shared accountability, while the Nordic P&L remained, he played an important role in supporting prioritisation and ensuring business requirements were clearly understood and structured.
Mikael brings a solid commercial understanding and works effectively across stakeholders, helping bridge regional needs with central teams. He contributed to maintaining momentum and alignment in a complex and evolving setup.
What makes Mikael so special is his deep knowledge and understanding of technology combined with that he really understands user needs. I hope to be working with Mikael sometime again.
I give Mikael the highest recommendations. We worked tight and very well together. Me as the technical lead and Mikael as responsible for the financial side of the project.
Excellent project manager and very sensitive team leader. Fun to work with and very professional.
Real outcomes from real engagements
€2B in digital sales to protect across four Nordic markets, while migrating from four local markets to one centralized group platform. Pandemic, wars, and travel industry crisis created constant pressure. Dozens of stakeholders with urgent business needs competing for limited development capacity.
Built a prioritization model that let the Nordic MD request a ranked top-10 list for the region, consolidated against group direction. Enabled successive transition to centralized UK-coordinated teams while keeping Nordic requirements driving priorities.
Four Nordic markets aligned around one backlog. Revenue protected through transformation. Nordic priorities stayed relevant despite centralization.
Bug triage was a time sink. Each bug bounced between tech leads, testers, and teams for weeks before anyone decided if it even needed fixing.
Built a lightweight prioritization model that let bug triage make priority decisions independently, without pulling in tech leads and development teams.
Triage decisions went from weeks to minutes. Development teams freed up to build forward instead of sitting in endless bug discussions.
Regulatory requirements consumed most development capacity. Mandatory, non-negotiable. The remaining time was fought over by multiple business areas all demanding fixes, adjustments, and features.
Created a structured prioritization framework for the non-regulatory backlog, with clear principles for evaluating and ranking competing requests.
Team aligned on what matters. Better use of limited discretionary development time. Less noise, more delivery.
Curious? Book 30 minutes with me. I'll listen, you decide if I can help, and if it feels right we'll figure out the next step together.